Posts tagged social networks

Supreme Court makes non-ridiculous ruling on hyperlinks

By Brian Jackson

This week the Supreme Court of Canada decided that it would not make a ruling that would irrevocably harm the Internet, be impossible to enforce, and likely be ignored by all normal people who use the Internet.

To elaborate, the court delivered its ruling in the case of Crookes v. Newton, of which the central question of the case was whether a person could be liable for linking to defamatory content. It decided that it was not defamation because a link is not really publication, but just a digital reference that allows for someone to reach the original published material. For a more detailed description of the legal implications of the ruling, Michael Geist’s blog post lays out the important details well.

Brian Jackson, Associate Editor, ITBusiness.ca

Brian Jackson, Associate Editor, ITBusiness.ca

Read the rest of this entry »

LinkedIn founder dead wrong about privacy being just for ‘old people’

Here we go again. Once more, the chief of a major online social network has called into question the relevance of privacy in today’s connected world. This time it is Reid Hoffman, founder of LinkedIn, who recently said that “privacy is an ‘old people’ issue.” Really? He’s dead wrong

What is most unfortunate is that Mr Hoffman, like many of his peers, looks at privacy narrowly, through the wrong lens. He thinks along

Ann Cavoukian, Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario

Ann Cavoukian, Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario

the lines of classic zero-sum: you can only have more of one interest, not another. This is nonsense. People need to connect and have moments of solitude, reflection, intimacy – namely, privacy.

Read the rest of this entry »

Privacy concerns with Google +

 By Tony Bradley

 

Back on Day 15 I examined Google+ privacy and found a couple things that seemed to be suspicious or give me some reason for concern.

I spoke with someone at Google, though, to clear up a few things about Google+ privacy, so for today’s 30 Days With Google+ post I want to clarify my understanding of Google+ privacy.

There are two main concerns I had regarding Google+ privacy–granting permissions in Google+ Games, and the broad scope of the terms of service (ToS) required just to use Google+.  Read the rest of this entry »

Lessons learned from Kenneth Cole’s tacky tweets

 For all those who needed an illustration of how a business shouldn’t use Twitter, Kenneth Cole kindly provided it this week by using the current unrest in Egypt as a promotional tool.

“Millions are in uproar in #Cairo,” read the original tweet from Thursday morning. “Rumor is they heard our new spring collection is now available online at http://bit.ly/KCairo.”

Widespread uproar was the result, all right, but not as a result of any spring collection. Such was the magnitude of the outcry at Cole’s insensitivity, in fact, that the company hastily removed the tweet that same day and issued two retractions instead.

“Re Egypt tweet: we weren’t intending to make light of a serious situation,” read the first. “We understand the sensitivity of this historic moment -KC”

A second, posted on Facebook soon afterward, read as follows:

“I apologize to everyone who was offended by my insensitive tweet about the situation in Egypt. I’ve dedicated my life to raising awareness about serious social issues, and in hindsight my attempt at humor regarding a nation liberating themselves against oppression was poorly timed and absolutely inappropriate.”

Related stories

How not to waste time on Twitter

Tweet nothings won’t get you hard somethings, Google expert warns marketers

5 insider tips to tame the Twitter beast

Cole’s apology didn’t prevent the creation of a satirical Twitter account inspired by the gaffe, however, and it’s now filled with mock tweets such as, “South Africans won’t be able to tear APARTheid my new knits — they’re just that strong!”

‘It Goes in the Trash’

Sensitivity, of course, is a key requirement of any business trying to use Twitter as a promotional tool, and Cole’s original tweet failed miserably on that front. Cole, however, is by no means alone. We couldn’t resist putting together a small roundup of other notable gaffes from other businesses and public-facing officials.

  • Back in 2007, Steve Rubel, a senior vice president at publicity agency Edelman, used Twitter to post a negative comment about PC Magazine. “PC Mag is another. I have a free sub[scription] but it goes in the trash,” he tweeted, prompting the magazine’s editor-in-chief to publicly suggest a media boycott. Rubel later apologized.

 

  • In 2009, Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban criticized referees via Twitter during a game. He was fined $25,000.

 

  • An employee of Vodafone UK used an unattended keyboard to send a homophobic tweet from the company’s @VodafoneUK account, which then had more than 8,500 followers. In response, the company had to issue multiple apologies.

 

‘Pls Refudiate’

  • Late last year, a profane tweet was made on Sen. Chris Dodd’s (D-Conn.) Twitter account. “”U love torturing me w this s—,” the tweet read, causing Dodd’s office to have to scramble with an explanation and an apology.

 

  • Speaking of unfortunate word choices, former Alaska governor Sarah Palin used a nonexistent word in a tweet last year and then excused it by likening herself to Shakespeare. The word in question was refudiate: “Ground Zero Mosque supporters: doesn’t it stab you in the heart, as it does ours throughout the heartland? Peaceful Muslims, pls refudiate” Later, she sent a tweet of justification: “Shakespeare liked to coin new words, too. Got to celebrate it!”

 

  • Another bizarre turn of phrase was tweeted last year by the U.S. embassy in Beijing, which in a Twitter pollution report referred to Beijing’s air as “crazy bad.” Of course, at least it used real words…

 

  • Earlier this year a U.K. councillor admitted on Twitter that her party had not effectively tackled inequality, despite the party’s proclamations to the contrary. “Inequalities deepened despite our 13 years in power,” wrote Isobel Bowler.

 

6 Twitter Rules of Thumb

What can businesses learn from these well-publicized missteps? There are plenty guides out there for using Twitter effectively. Based on the above examples, however, I’d hasten to add the following rules of thumb.

1. Be Sensitive. Never, ever use a political, environmental or civic crisis to promote your company or your products. It reeks of opportunism.

2. Be Positive. As a business entity, you should never post negative comments about others on Twitter. You’re the only one that will end up looking bad.

3. Be Clear. Make sure you have a policy regarding who in your company may post using the company’s official Twitter account, and make sure you offer them training on what is and isn’t appropriate. Make clear the ramifications for misuse.

4. Be Clean. Never use profanities or other vulgar terms in a tweet. Once again, it will only make you look bad, and you’ll likely offend customers, too.

5. Be Literate. Don’t follow in the footsteps of Sarah Palin or George W. Bush: Make sure it’s a word before you make it public.

6. Be Careful. Last but definitely not least, remember that using social media is a little bit like driving. Don’t do it while intoxicated, and always think twice before you tweet.

By Katherine Noyes -PC World (US)

Follow Katherine Noyes on Twitter: @Noyesk.

Facebook suspends controversial data mining feature – for now

Well at least this time they didn’t wait to get rapped on the knuckles by Canadian privacy and security officials.

Faced with strong criticism over a feature that allows application developers and third party Web sites to access mobile phone numbers and addresses of some of its users, Facebook announced on Monday that it was temporarily disabling the feature.

Nestor Arellano

Basically, the now suspended feature allowed developers to ask for your home address and mobile phone number if you’ve included this information in your profile.

In a blog post Facebook, says it has decided to suspend the feature after receiving “useful feedback.”

Temporarily disabling? Useful feedback? Maybe it’s more like user outrage. Don’t these people get it? Read the rest of this entry »

2011: The decade of Privacy by Design starts now

The Future of Privacy Forum, a Washington-based think tank that promotes responsible data practices, recently posted its First Annual List of Privacy Ins and Outs.  It’s a playful – but insightful – look at what’s hot and what’s not in the world of privacy for the year ahead. 

Ann Cavoukian

I was delighted (and gratified) to see Privacy by Design (PbD) make the list of what’s “in.”  2010 was a great year for Privacy by Design – the made-in-Ontario framework for embedding privacy into the architecture of technologies and practices, right from the outset. Around the world, PbD continued to gather momentum and gain increasingly widespread support. We’re clearly at a tipping point.

So what can look forward to for PbD in 2011?  I’m anticipating this year as the launch of the Privacy by Design decade – one that will assure the future of privacy.  Here is my “Top 5” list: Read the rest of this entry »

Make your social media campaign soar with Dragonfly Marketing

How does one navigate the contemporary marketing scene of ubiquitous internet, email, Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, and online blogs? 

Authors Jennifer Aaker and Andy Smith show how to harness the power of social media in their book The Dragonfly Effect. 

Jennifer is a social psychologist and professor of marketing at Stanford Business School; Andy, her husband, is a marketing consultant. 

The couple’s research led to developing a model of how to “Focus + GET” success. Read the rest of this entry »

Leave Out Violence with the click of a mouse

The call for businesses to use social media to boost the presence, increase sales or enhance customer touch points keeps on growing louder each day. 

Nestor Arellano

But at the same time we keep reading reports about how SMBs are puzzled by these new tools. Perhaps some of the most creative ways of using social media can be found in the various cause-oriented and charitable organizations that are effectively employing these tools to boost awareness, augment programs or raise funds. 

Leave out Violence (LOVE) an award-winning non-profit youth organization has effectively been using the power of digital images for some three years now to spread its message of hope for victims of violence against youths.  Read the rest of this entry »

Will YouTube kill the networks?

 When YouTube first came on the scene it was dismissed by mainstream communicators as one of those blips on the radar screen that would soon pass on.

 How wrong can you be?

Jim Stanton

 Today we see YouTube used by media savvy U.S. politicians. When President Obama was running for the Presidency, his communication staff prepared brilliantly crafted YouTube productions that achieved an estimated 14.5 million viewing hours. How could one ever hope to obtain that sort of reach with a regular TV commercial?

 Canada’s Prime Minister, Steven Harper, has gone the YouTube route as well to reach the younger demographics and was successful in getting his messages across.

 Susan Boyle’s, “I Have A Dream” CD had 400 million video hits on Web sites within nine days. The Los Angeles Times said, “Her popularity on YouTube may in part be due to the broad range of emotion packed into a short clip which was perfect for the Internet.” “I Have a Dream” is the fastest selling CD in history, all due to YouTube.

 The Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police and many state and local police agencies are now producing videos to be shown on YouTube as an extension of the old Crime Stoppers programs. These are meeting with increasing success in nailing the bad guys.

 New York City’s prestigious Guggenheim Museum and YouTube recently launched a competition to search for the most creative videos and expand on the idea of what video can be. Named “YouTube Play. A Biennial of Creative Videos”, the project will select 20 videos to be presented at the Guggenheim on October 21st and simultaneously in Berlin, Bilbao and Venice.

 Guggenheim Foundation Deputy Director, Nancy Spector said, “We’re not looking for what is now, we’re looking for what is next.”

 You know you have created an instrument of change when governments want to shut you down. Iran and North Korea, to name just two countries, have both implemented powerful national firewalls to block access to YouTube because they want to control what their citizens can see.

 Psiphon (www. psiphon.ca) is a web proxy designed to help Internet users securely bypass the content-filtering systems used to censor the Internet by governments. Psiphon was developed by the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto, building upon previous generations of web proxy software systems, such as the “SafeWeb” and “Anonymizer” systems.

In 2008 Psiphon was spun off as a Canadian corporation that continues to develop advanced censorship circumvention systems and technologies. Psiphon maintains its research and development lab and computer network “red team” at The Citizen Lab, Munk Centre for International Studies, University of Toronto.

YouTube also calls into question the need for traditional networks like CBS, NBC, ABC, BBC, etc.

Jeffrey Macpherson has come up with a brilliant idea for TV stardom: use YouTube to create your audience. The 32-year-old Canadian has emerged as an early break-out star in the new era of video podcasting.

Macpherson stars in “Tiki Bar TV,” a periodic series of quirky, vignettes – each lasting only a few minutes. They are available only by download from his web site, www.tikibartv.com or Apple’s iTunes service for the iPod.

The series has won a rabid following since debuting last year. Each segment draws approximately 300,000 or so viewers, rivaling the reach of many cable shows.

When disasters occur, folks are on the scene before first responders arrive, streaming live video shots of the incident to the world at large. I would like to suggest YouTube is causing the same shift in literacy as the Gutenberg bible did in 1452-53.

My position is that we have only just begun to understand the power and reach of YouTube.

Top 4 questions you should ask about digital media metrics

One of the wonders of our digital world is the ability to measure anything.  The challenge remains in making sure that the appropriate indicators are being measured and that the data is correctly interpreted.  

The opportunities and challenges of audience measurement were discussed at the most recent iLunch – The Face of Demand presented by Interactive Ontario.

The conversation evolved into a best practices guide for offline and online audience measurement and cross-platform conversion between traditional and digital media.

Paul Bernier of Advisio spoke about Google Analytics and other traditional web measurement tools. He emphasized that despite the overabundance of data it is important to distinguish which metrics are relevant for a particular site. Read the rest of this entry »