Posts tagged Google
New pharmacy spam campaign using Google brand hijacking
Feb 17th
MessageLabs Intelligence recently tracked a new pharmaceutical spam campaign promoting a supposedly “Google-accredited” online pharmacy. This is obvious brand hijacking: Google does not host or approve any pharmacy sites.
We contacted Google about this, and a spokesperson responded with, “Google has a track record of fighting similar types of scams, and we also recommend that users carefully review online offers that look too good to be true before entering any of their information: http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/12/fighting-fraud-online-taking-google.html“.
The spam message contains text promoting a drug for preventing hair loss, and a link to a blog the spammer has set up on a popular free blogging site, shown in the screenshot below:
[example of spam email promoting fake pharmacy brand] Read the rest of this entry »
No Honeycomb OS for Galaxy Tab
Jan 5th
By Jared Newman
Single-core Android tablets like Samsung’s Galaxy Tab won’t meet the minimum requirements for Honeycomb, Google’s tablet-optimized operating system version, according to a manufacturer.
Bobby Cha, managing director of Korean consumer electronics firm Enspert, told PCMag that Honeycomb will require a dual-core Cortex A9 processor to run properly. So far, the only chipset to include this processor is Nvidia’s Tegra 2, due to appear in many Android tablets at the Consumer Electronics Show this week.
Video: Samsung Galaxy Tab joins tablet race
Cha said that a minimum screen resolution of 1280-by-720 may also be necessary, but he noted that Honeycomb-based tablets will come with seven-inch screens and larger.
Samsung’s Galaxy Tab has a 1 GHz Hummingbird processor and a 1024-by-600 resolution display. The company has previously suggested that the Galaxy Tab would update no further than the smartphone-focused Android 2.3 (“Gingerbread”), but Cha’s comments appear to seal the Tab’s fate as a rapidly aging product.
Google, meanwhile, has remained relatively silent about what Honeycomb entails, or for that matter, whether the version number in question is 2.4 or 3.0.
Related story - Microsoft to roll out ARM-based iPad rival in 2011?
Andy Rubin, Google’s vice president of engineering, showed and early version of Motorola’s Honeycomb tablet last December, but shied away from details. All we know is that the tablet-friendly Android version will allow for large-screen apps and software-based home and back buttons. More details are bound to trickle out this week as electronics companies show off their upcoming tablets.
If Cha is correct about Honeycomb’s dual-core processor and screen resolution requirements, Google may be trying to draw a bold line between cheap Android tablets and premium products from companies like Motorola and Toshiba. Unfortunately for early adopters of Samsung’s first tablet, which gambled on Android 2.2 for holiday availability, the Galaxy Tab falls on the wrong side of that line.
Web firms cry foul over Google results
Dec 15th
By Katherine Noyes (PC World)
A number of Web sites including TripAdvisor, WebMD, Yelp, and Citysearch have charged that Google gives preferential treatment to its own content when providing results for users’ online searches, the Wall Street Journal reported on Monday.
“Google does seem to be chasing us and I don’t like it one bit,” TripAdvisor CEO Stephen Kaufer told the Journal.
What the world Googled in 2010
Dec 13th
By Ian Paul
Another year is coming to a close and with it the endless parade of year-in-review articles rehashing the triumphs and tragedies of 2010. We’ve already seen Yahoo’s top searches of 2010 showing that Yahoos this year were most concerned with the BP Oil Spill, World Cup in South Africa, Miley Cyrus, Kim Kardashian and Lady Gaga.
Now it’s Google’s turn with a look at what its millions of users have been interested in this past year.
Google pays out ‘dollar of vindication’ for trespassing
Dec 6th
By Juan Carlos Perez
After a legal battle that lasted two-and-a-half years, Google has been found guilty of trespassing on a Pennsylvania family’s property to take photos of their property for its Maps website.
However, the penalty is nominal: Google will have to pay only $1 to Aaron and Christine Boring, who sued Google in 2008, seeking compensatory and punitive damages.
App Store for Web browsers coming soon
Nov 30th
By Katherine Noyes
Along with its audited financial statements indicating a revenue increase of 34 percent last year, Mozilla late last week also published a “State of Mozilla” report providing a glimpse at what the organization is planning for the future.
Firefox for Android is one part of those future plans, of course, and will be released “in a few months,” according to the report.
Even more intriguing, though, is the company’s confirmation that it’s planning what it calls an “Open Web App ecosystem”–also known, in other words, as a platform-independent app store.
Device-Independent
“The current app model has traits that threaten some of the characteristics that have made the Web so vibrant a platform, particularly in the mobile space,” Mozilla explained in its report.
Specifically, “apps are often device specific and platform specific,” it said. “Information we create in an application is stuck in that application and / or that platform. One doesn’t join a unified whole as one can with the Web. App-related information isn’t generally linkable or findable. In addition, developers often need to get permission from one or more gatekeepers to reach people–from a network operator, a device manufacturer, a ‘store’ operator. Similarly, consumers must go through these filters to access new functionality.”
Related Story: Toronto students behind Firefox browser’s amazing overhaul
As a way to remedy such problems, Mozilla has designed a prototype of an Open Web App ecosystem, it says, noting that “this includes a system design, technical documentation and examples of what such a system would look like and work like.” A video on YouTube offers further explanation.
HTML5, CSS and Javascript
Taking inspiration from the success of Apple’s App Store, of course, Google has been working on its own Chrome Web Store as well. Mozilla also mentioned similar plans back in May.
“Supporting the needs of Web developers in their efforts to develop websites and apps that aren’t bound to a specific browser and work across the Web is core to Mozilla’s public benefit mission,” Mozilla wrote back then.
Accordingly, an open Web app store should “exclusively host web applications based upon HTML5, CSS, Javascript and other widely-implemented open standards in modern web browsers – to avoid interoperability, portability and lock-in issues,” it explained.
Such a store should also “ensure that discovery, distribution and fulfillment works across all modern browsers, wherever they run (including on mobile devices)” and “set forth editorial, security and quality review guidelines and processes that are transparent and provide for a level playing field.”
Finally, an open Web app store should “respect individual privacy by not profiling and tracking individual user behavior beyond what’s strictly necessary for distribution and fulfillment” and it should “be open and accessible to all app producers and app consumers,” Mozilla wrote in May.
Too Many Apps For That?
App stores are becoming a ubiquitous part of the Internet; in addition to Apple’s longstanding offering and the planned entries from Google and Mozilla, there are also app stores from Research In Motion for the Blackberry phone and from Microsoft for Windows Phone 7.
Then, too, there’s Apple’s Mac App Store for desktops and Google’s assortment for Google TV, among others.
Few, however, can boast Mozilla’s commitment to openness and open standards like HTML, CSS and JavaScript. Google’s Chrome store notwithstanding, it seems to me that amid all these platform-specific offerings, a device-agnostic store is just what we need.
6 things we hate about Google
Nov 12th
By Keir Thomas
I’m starting to get the feeling that Google’s Websites are over-engineered–so much so that I’m feeling nostalgia for the days of simple search when you just typed what you’re looking for and got a page of results.
Alas, somebody at Google headquarters believes those days are long gone.
With this in mind, here are my top six Google annoyances. Read the rest of this entry »
SEO lessons from the ‘ground zero mosque’
Sep 14th
Unless you’ve been hiding under a rock it would not have been easy to escape the controversy over the proposed construction of a “mosque” at Ground Zero in New York City. The words “mosque” and “ground zero” proved to be a volatile mix that ignited a clash of cultures and ideas between those arguing religious freedom and those calling the planned construction an insult to the memory of those killed in the 9/11 terrorist attacks.
The words also make for one hell of a good SEO (search engine optimization) device. It didn’t matter that: 1) the building in question is not a mosque but an Islamic centre that includes a swimming pool, community rooms and offices; and 2) it is not in Ground Zero but actually two blocks away from where the World Trade Center once stood. Nearly every printed, televised, blogged, or Twitter message an posted account of the topic used the terms “mosque” and “ground zero.”
I think this illustrates the powerful impact that SEO and search engines have not only over marketing goods and services over the Internet but also on our world view. Read the rest of this entry »
How I Googled my apartment hunt
Jul 23rd
When I found myself hunting for an apartment for the third time in 18 months, an uncomfortable feeling of weariness started to seep into my bones.
Looking for a place to live is daunting in a place like Toronto, where the competition amongst renters is fierce. One must avoid slum lords, master a knowledge of tenant rights, make cold calls, and prepare to hand over more personal information than your mother knows about you to a complete stranger. But instead of succumbing to apartment hunt exhaustion, I decided to give it a Web 2.0 punch and make finding the perfect place to live nearly automatic.




