Archive for October, 2011

How to lose public trust and achieve international ridicule

by Claudiu Popa

Talk to anyone in the world of business about their biggest hacking fear and you’re bound to hear that “embarrassment” ranks right up there near the top.

Claudiu Popa

Everyone knows that to do a proper job of alienating clients and embarrassing your organization you need to not just be good at, but excel at three things:

  1. amateurish planning in protecting against security and privacy problems
  2. boneheaded response once a breach has taken place
  3. abject failure to make sure it doesn’t happen again

 

I know what you’re thinking: “Hey! That sounds pretty difficult to pull off! I was hoping for an easy way to annihilate my audience and damage my credibility! I thought you were good! Can you at least give me an example?” Read the rest of this entry »

Canadian entrepreneurs don’t fear risk – investors do

By Christine Wong

Christine Wong, Staff Writer, ITBusiness.ca

Penny for your thoughts?

Canada’s high tech startups would love to raise some pretty pennies for theirs. The fledgling firms are brimming with bright ideas, but can’t raise enough cash to turn them into reality.

Venture capitalists haven’t been as generouswith homegrown IT firms lately. The result: a Canadian tech sector cash crunch.
Read the rest of this entry »

Part II: Dissecting the brain of the market pays off for BlueArc

By Francis Moran and Leo Valiquette

In a recent post, we introduced BlueArc, a maker of networked attached storage (NAS) systems for managing unstructured data in high-performance computing applications, and Ken Rosen, a corporate strategy and marketing consultant who worked with the Blue Arc team in the mid-2000s.

Rosen talked about how sales for the company had hit a plateau by 2004, forcing BlueArc to evolve its marketing and sales model. It could no longer rely on prospects being able to figure out for themselves how and why the product would be a fit for them. BlueArc needed to talk with key decision makers within its target markets and learn how to relate its products to their needs in a language they understood. It needed to win over those individuals with the influence to champion BlueArc within their organizations.

“The goal is to dissect the brain of the market and know at a conscious level how the market thinks … do that and you have a shot at being able to speak their language about things that really matter to them,” Rosen said.

In 2004 and 2005, BlueArc focused on animation, drug discovery and Internet services, then moved on to the oil and gas upstream exploration, design and simulation markets in 2006 and 2007.

How did BlueArc track and measure the efforts of its sales and marketing teams against results?

“A key tactic was simply identifying key markets as the only markets visible in the CRM system,” Rosen said. “This sounds trivial, but if reps saw that management was only tracking prospects in key markets, it was a strong signal that focus was serious.

“At the same time, pipeline was tracked by vertical market, so it was obvious long before deals closed whether the focus was working. Finally, the marketing team assigned a point person for each market to work with the sales teams. This person was motivated to support reps in closing business in the market and worked with reps to hear what parts of the targeting and messaging were and were not working.”

As always, executive focus was critical. In a telling moment, a successful, senior sales rep said, “I don’t think I need to know about these markets. I just need someone to get me in front of a prospect so I can ask about their pain.” BlueArc CEO Mike Gustafson and VP of sales Chris McBride responded with a single message: “Sales skills and the ability to do discovery are table stakes. Outselling the competition means our reps walk in the door knowing about key customer challenges, so they can become trusted advisors, not students.”

What was the outcome?

The result of this focused market segmentation and primary research? BlueArc posted six consecutive quarters of record revenue growth.

Executive buy-in and a shared philosophy were crucial. This, after all, had to be a team effort across the organization that could rely on whatever support it needed, from the front-line sales staff to the engineers.

Rosen remembers his first conversation with Gustafson.

“I began the meeting with, ‘Here’s what I believe, if you agree, let’s talk, if not …  we probably shouldn’t go on: If you want to sell to me, you have to solve my pain. And if you want to even discuss my pain, you have to do it in my language.’”

Gustafson of course agreed.

“To sell to the enterprise market, you have to talk to the audience, ask them what keeps them up at night and listen to how they talk about their challenges,” Rosen said. “The more valuable insights don’t come from asking about what product or feature customers want, they come from asking customers what they do, need, and crave.”

This entire process can be led internally or with external help such as Rosen, but the challenge of doing it in-house is significant.

“There are two practical challenges: first, if you believe in doing the research, it can be hard for someone in the company to ask questions without selling…and hard for a prospect to open up without feeling like they are in some sort of sales cycle. On the other hand, if you believe you should just hire someone who already knows about your markets, it simply isn’t practical to find someone whose task is to be, and continue to be, an expert on all functions of all the potential markets you can sell into.”

What were the key lessons learned?

On his blog, Rosen has distilled the lessons learned from his experience at BlueArc into a five-point scale for deciding which target markets to pursue.

To quote:

1. How intense is prospect pain in the area you serve?

If the pain from the problem you solve isn’t setting prospects’ hair on fire, if they don’t think about it almost every day, your sales cycle will be longer. Personally, I greatly prefer customers who use words like “pain” over “need,” but both trump “desire.” Sell aspirin, not vitamins.

2. How well do you solve that pain?

This is where most companies are most comfortable, because it is the most inward-looking question: Do we solve the problem? For too many companies, a “yes” to this question implies “OK, let’s hire the sales force and start advertising!” We humbly disagree. It’s one of five criteria and you’re not likely the only firm solving the problem.

3. How strong is the competition?

This criterion is pretty obvious: less competitive environments ease the sales cycle.

4. Can you actually close deals?

Many companies think about the problem they solve without worrying about whether they can actually reach a decision maker. Maybe he only buys integrated products. Maybe she only buys from Fortune 500 companies. Maybe he hasn’t changed vendors in 10 years because the cost to change is too high. Maybe the ideal market is fragmented and requires a sales channel too expensive for this stage of your development. You have to convert someone whoneeds your product into someone who buys your product.

5. Long-term value of the market

Market selection doesn’t mean you cut your growth aspirations. Far from it. It means you believe the fastest path to growth is by saying something compelling to someone specific. So our final criteria: What is market growth? Will success lead you to adjacent markets (Geoffrey Moore’s bowling pin strategy)? Does one market offer better-known references? Does your team have special background that makes success easier?

This is the second article in a continuing series that will feature case studies and anecdotal stories from entrepreneurs, consultants and veteran marketers about their efforts to develop, implement and measure marketing programs to bring technology to market and grow market share. We invite your feedback.

Tech jobs that cloud computing will create

by Bernard Golden

I was interested in this week’s ZDNet piece, Cloud computing’s real creative destruction may be the IT workforce.

The piece discusses a presentation at last week’s Gartner Symposium that posited cloud computing will be a net destructor of IT jobs.

Read the rest of this entry »

Meet Screenreach Interactive

By Francis Moran and Leo Valiquette

We first encountered Screenreach Interactive and its founder, Paul Rawlings, several months ago when we featured Jon Bradford, the man behind U.K. startup accelerators The Difference Engine and Springboard.

Rawlings and Screenreach completed the first cycle of The Difference Engine’s 13-week program in 2010. When we asked Bradford for an example of a successful graduate from that program, he was quick to sing Rawlings’ praises.

“He was not proprietary about his ideas, he was very open to new suggestions, new directions and wasn’t wedded to, ‘Look, this is what I’m doing and I’m not going to listen to anybody else,’” Bradford said.

“I think having an open mind, being able to listen, to react in a positive fashion was probably the making of him. He was also not very selfish about bringing in other team members, making sure he had a good team around him beyond the program itself. One of his mentors (Sam Morton, pictured right in the photo below with Rawlings) became one of his members of staff.”

There was no doubt in our minds that Rawlings is a man with an open mind. He has, after all, agreed to share with us Screenreach’s evolving story, warts and all, in the hope that there will be insights and lessons learned here that will resonate with other entrepreneurs working to bring their technology to market.

What is Screenreach?

Screenreach’s flagship product, Screach, is an interactive digital media platform that allows a brand to create a real-time, two-way interactive experience between a smart device (through the Screach app) and any content, on any screen or just within the mobile device itself. Using Screach, the smart phone can become a game controller, quiz answer pad, a voting and polling tool, a bingo card, a roulette table or a number of other things to engage and interact with consumers.

“The cool thing about it is that it allows you to profile your users to learn more about them and measure your ROI, and to also reward consumers for interacting,” Rawlings said. “It allows you to bring your ad, event, TV program or radio show to life by allowing your consumer to interact with you straight from their smartphone.” Read the rest of this entry »

Does hack bring Siri to iPhone 4?

by Nestor E. Arellano

Access to the voice command and response app Siri is one of the few things that differentiate Apple’s iPhone 4S from its older sibling the iPhone 4. 

Nestor Arellano

Hacker Steve Troughton-Smith, credited a couple of years ago for uncovering iPhone’s Web tethering capabilities, claims to have found a way to port a basic versions of Siri to his iPhone 4.  Read the rest of this entry »

30 considerations for getting tech to market: Part III

By Francis Moran and Leo Valiquette

While there will no doubt be the occasional post that will still fall into the Commercialization Ecosystem category, today marks the official end of this series with which we launched our new blog back in February. Next week, we will introduce several new series, but first, let’s conclude our three-part recap of what we have learned about getting technology to market. Read the rest of this entry »

Supreme Court makes non-ridiculous ruling on hyperlinks

By Brian Jackson

This week the Supreme Court of Canada decided that it would not make a ruling that would irrevocably harm the Internet, be impossible to enforce, and likely be ignored by all normal people who use the Internet.

To elaborate, the court delivered its ruling in the case of Crookes v. Newton, of which the central question of the case was whether a person could be liable for linking to defamatory content. It decided that it was not defamation because a link is not really publication, but just a digital reference that allows for someone to reach the original published material. For a more detailed description of the legal implications of the ruling, Michael Geist’s blog post lays out the important details well.

Brian Jackson, Associate Editor, ITBusiness.ca

Brian Jackson, Associate Editor, ITBusiness.ca

Read the rest of this entry »

Sorting out which equipment to keep and which ones to dump

by Clare Kumar

Pretend you are visiting your office for the first time. Take a look around with fresh eyes.

What do you see? Does every piece of furniture serve the purpose it was intended for? Are there pieces simply attracting piles of paper?

Clare Kumar

Often when we spend a lot of time in a place, be it work or home, we stop really seeing what’s there. We just accept that it’s supposed to be there, whether it’s working or not.

To make sure that everything in your office ought to be there, take the following steps:

Read the rest of this entry »

3 things you should know before jailbreaking your iPhone

by Yale Holder

I’ve had a scary experience unlocking  iPhones that I hope no one else has to go through.

Having unlocked phones already, mainly BlackBerry phones, I thought that unlocking iPhones would be just as easy and not as complicated – boy was I wrong. Here is what I learnt… Read the rest of this entry »